Engagement findings point to a clear need for a community tier 2 gynaecology service that is easier to access, more personalised and better able to manage routine benign conditions before hospital referral is needed. Below are the main themes taken from several engagement exercises:
Access and waiting times
- Women often described long waits and difficulty getting help at the right time.
- Many felt they were passed between services or referred to hospital for issues that could have been managed earlier in the community.
- This supports a service that offers earlier assessment, clearer pathways and community-based care closer to home.
Feeling heard and respected
- Women repeatedly said they want to be listened to, believed and treated with empathy.
- Many described feeling dismissed, especially when symptoms were long-term or affecting daily life.
- This highlights the need for good communication, continuity and shared decision-making.
Expertise and confidence
- Women reported variable knowledge and confidence among professionals.
- They valued staff who could explain symptoms clearly, offer treatment options and avoid unnecessary escalation to hospital care.
- This suggests the service needs practitioners with clear expertise in routine benign gynaecology and agreed escalation routes where specialist input is needed.
Local and flexible care
- Women wanted care in local, familiar and easy-to-reach settings.
- Travel, parking, privacy, work, caring responsibilities and transport all affected access.
- This suggests the service should use accessible community settings and offer flexible appointment options.
Clear information
- Many women said they were unclear about what support was available or how to access it.
- Lack of information contributed to anxiety, delay and confusion.
- The service should be supported by clear, plain English information on what it offers, how to access it and when onward referral may be needed.
Inclusive by design
- The engagement highlighted barriers linked to culture, language, disability, neurodiversity and trauma.
- Women also raised the importance of privacy, reasonable adjustments and access to female clinicians for intimate care.
- This means the service should be inclusive, trauma-informed and sensitive to personal and cultural preferences from the outset.
Joined-up support
- Women often described overlap between gynaecology, menopause, pelvic health, mental wellbeing and wider life pressures.
- This suggests the service should sit within a wider women’s health pathway rather than operate in isolation.
- Strong links with primary care, diagnostics, pelvic health, menopause support, mental health services and community support will help provide more joined-up care.
Conclusion
Overall, the engagement supports a service that provides timely, local, expert and compassionate care for routine benign gynaecology conditions. It should help women get the right support earlier, reduce unnecessary hospital referrals and offer a better experience between primary and secondary care.